home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
- Path: istar.net!infoshare!whome!herboid!geac!itcyyz!xrtll!bokonon!stephen
- From: stephen@bokonon.ussinc.com (Stephen M. Dunn)
- Subject: Re: To V42Bis or not to V42Bis??
- Organization: United System Solutions Inc.
- Date: Wed, 7 Feb 1996 04:32:29 GMT
- Message-ID: <DME1y5.30x@bokonon.ussinc.com>
- References: <4ej6rh$oa2@canopus.cc.umanitoba.ca>
-
- In article <4ej6rh$oa2@canopus.cc.umanitoba.ca> simhon@mbnet.mb.ca (Simon Hon) writes:
- $ Should I have V42bis on or off? I find that at 28.8 connections I get
- $faster CPS rates with it off. Does this make any sense?
-
- You should have it on in most cases.
-
- The actual connection rate between modems should not be affected
- by it; the connection between modems is negotiated first, and then
- error correction and data compression are negotiated afterwards.
-
- V.42 will improve throughput, as well as correcting errors, but
- it will introduce some additional latency (delays). Depending
- on what you're doing, this may be an acceptable trade - or it may
- have a substantial negative impact on performance.
-
- V.42bis, if it's implemented well, should never have a large
- negative impact if we're comparing apples to apples here. If,
- on the other hand, you're comparing V.42bis+V.42 to neither at
- all, then the difference you're seeing is probably due to
- V.42, not to V.42bis.
- --
- stephen@bokonon.ussinc.com ...!{xrtll,gts.org}!bokonon!stephen
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Stephen M. Dunn, CNE, ACE, Sr. Systems Analyst, United System Solutions Inc.
- 104 Carnforth Road, Toronto, ON, Canada M4A 2K7 (416) 750-7946 x251
-